football in: [ 2010 ]  [ 1999 ]  [ germany ]  [ africa ]  [ asia ]  [ internet ]  [ universe ]  [ archives ]
 
THE SHOT THAT PASSED RIGHT THROUGH THE NET    African Cup Of Nations 2000  JAN 22 - FEB 13  Nigeria/Ghana 
QUALIFIERS PREVIEW MATCHES REVIEW ABOUT
*LIVE TICKER
 
 
General 
some views
co-hosting
rankings
the groups
the regions
group matches
k.o. stage
 
Group A
Group B
Group C
Group D
back to top
 
The other side of co-hosting
 
  • hosts have an advantage
  • this time there are two hosts and they both are top teams
  • the schedule makes it possible that particular teams have to play hosts up to three (3!) times to win the Cup
  • this can hardly be avoided and makes it more unlikely for some teams to win - but not impossible
 Host countries always have an extra edge. Some times they suffer from the high expectations but usually they have at least one advantage: Their opponents are extra careful, like in an away game, especially in the first round.
 This time there are two hosts. And not enough - they are both top class teams.

 What usually adds up to that: even in most recent occasions, the African Cup Of Nations 1998 or the just played friendly tournament at Libya the referees (or linesmen) have, let's put it this way, not been unkind to the hosts in critical situations.
 
 But what makes it even more difficult for the others: Some might have to play both hosts in away-matches to win the Cup.

 Not enough: In the worst case a team might have to play one host twice and the second for a third away game. It seems rather improbable that a team can overcome such a bad luck.

 Now, how is this possible?
 First of all there are two schedule versions around, which contain two different scenarios. Which one applies is not known at this time. Either the teams in Group A (except from Ghana) or the teams from Group D (except from Nigeria) could be possible victims:

1) in the schedule version available from the Ghana/Nigeria 2000 source:
a group A team (Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire, Togo) has to play Ghana in the first round and could meet them again in the semi-finals. In the finals then they could play Nigeria at Lagos.
2) in the schedule version available from CAF source:
a group D team (Morocco, Tunisia, Congo) has to play Nigeria in first round, might have to travel then in the semi-finals to Accra and play Ghana and could face a final with again Nigeria at Lagos

 All other teams could face hosts twice, except from when the schedule available from GhanaNigeria 2000 is correct: Then Group C teams have the edge: They could not come across Ghana except from the final at Lagos. And that is at Nigeria, not at Ghana.

 Can it be avoided?
 Hardly possible - it would cause damage to the whole organisation of the co-hosting construction. To have the same chances Nigeria would have to play at Ghana and Ghana at Nigeria at least from quarter-finals on. This seems a bit stupid to take away the home team from the home crowds.
  

 This all puts Nigeria and Ghana even more in the pole position, makes it rather unlikely one of the 14 others could win. But one never knows. It is also still possible a team wins the cup without having to play against one host at all... 
 
 back to top 

 
 
© The Shot That Passed Right Through The Net. [ Mail ]